🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an celebration that began as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include functions where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to address predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The surge has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the Britain, Deutschland, Ireland and the Holland.

The period has transformed since that time, giving reduced attention to the accounts of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and more on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the observance is commemorated is a reflection of the political moment. How it progresses is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the summer we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a elected representative gains confidence to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in Europe as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A effort to remove the history of people of color and experience from the historical documents is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the celebration represents how minimally it can be influential if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the situation of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. An academic expert, a prof at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden actions for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just discontinue events including Black History Month altogether, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an period that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed across all seasons (as various establishments are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not evade political issues, and leaves space for people, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves simple recognition of the history when it ignores the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Institutions who observe it should not be reassured with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and awareness of subtle slights, but faced with the dangers that affect everyone if anti-racism is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and responsive. Maybe an complete renaming is required – Contemporary Black History Month.